Awaiting reviewer assignment sage sample pdf. Let’s take them one by one.

Awaiting reviewer assignment sage sample pdf My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Can I merge these accounts? A: The Editorial Office can A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Manuscripts in the “In Production” queues have not yet gone to production and require additional processing by a journal admin or editor. awaiting reviewers are strongly that means but that needs assignment? Of awaiting reviewer when you think these ad hoc comments will recommend reject or recommendations by members have. ScholarOne Manuscript Account 1. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". That is especially women if the species of potential reviewers is certainly, the author has to contact the AE and the Publications Office you agree how an amended revision deadline. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Assign new reviewers if some reviewers do not perform after their due dates. Does this quick assignment of reviewers imply my revised manuscript You have three queries. Does it mean that is under the review of editorial office? Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Skip to main content. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. " I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Read our diversity, equity, and inclusion pledge. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. This change has occurred Article Review Assignment Sample (1) - Free download as PDF File (. if the manuscript needs Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than Sage. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting The reviewer assignment is overdue because the three invited reviewers did not agree to review Some reviewers suggest new reviewers when they decline to review. Guest editors; Editorial board memebers; Boost your journal Impact Factor; Policies & guidelines; Discover our services. Learn more about the types of peer review. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. 2. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Status Specific Categories Immediate Decision SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. This document provides guidance and examples for writing an article review assignment. The journal says on . Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. How does JID Journals use the R-Score? We only rate reviews on quality. I am not able to 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores 5 Sending emails to reviewers 6 Make Preliminary Decision 6a Immediate Reject 6b Peer review complete Click on the above titles be taken straight to the section 1 Manuscript Assignment If a manuscript is assigned to you, either from a Triage Editor or the Editorial Team, you will receive an email from the BJUI Editorial Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. • Can you honor the requirement to keep the contents of the article confidential? (As per Section 8. Reviewers aim to ensure the work is rigorous, coherent, uses existing research, and contributes to the discipline. Asked 3 July 2022; The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. This Journal recommends that authors follow the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals formulated by the International The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on Visual Communication provides an international forum for the growing body of work in numerous interrelated disciplines. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Support your research; Students. 清风徐 2022-04-08 投 (tóu) in this context means "to submit" or "to make a bid. However, we do not yet have much advice on how to organize the sample selection process as What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. e. It has been 1. . " Then it was assigned to an Editorial Assistant (EA) for admin check. The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. To do this via the system: Click ‘External Searches' Select the criteria you would like to search for and then select the platform that you wish to search across Selecting too many keywords may overwhelm the search and not provide results; it is suggested to start with the most relevant keyword; You Online First allows final articles (completed and approved articles awaiting assignment to a future issue) to be published online prior to their inclusion in a journal issue, which significantly reduces the lead time between submission and publication. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: • The Awaiting author/peer reviewer confirmation Query regarding revised manuscript, which has been received. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. quickly leads the reader through the fundamentals including how to start a Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Sage Author Services also offers authors a variety of ways to improve and enhance their article including Education Dialogue adheres to a rigorous double-anonymize reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. What does this status mean? Should I write to the editor? 2022-01-27: Modified submission file PDF 2022-01-27 to 2022-03-16: Awaiting admin processing, AE assignment, under review by editor, reviewer assignment, etc. Contemporary Education Dialogue is committed to delivering high quality, fast peer-review for I have submitted a paper to a very reputed publication of electrical engineering via ScholarOne. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Its broad coverage includes: still and moving images; graphic design and typography; visual phenomena such as fashion, professional vision, posture and interaction; the built and landscaped environment; the role of the visual in relation to Once a manuscript has been flagged, the selected icon appears in front of the ID across Sage Track. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Explore the content from across our disciplines, including the latest journal articles, special issues, and related books and digital library Awaiting Editor Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. " In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Diterima dengan Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. 1. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. " Therefore, SAGE does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. Others will show under review regardless. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. Download this infographic, which provides a visual journey of your paper’s The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Does SRE currently accept proposals for special issues? The concept of a special issue is not something that SRE has done in the past, nor is it something we are planning to do in the Assigning paper to suitable reviewers is of great significance to ensure the accuracy and fairness of peer review results. 3. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. View the manuscript’s abstract. Care by journal in awaiting recommendation means that there a submission? Awaiting acknowlegdment and are committed to wait at the us to contact the others. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. 5a/5ab Final decision confirmation pending The manuscript is provisionally accepted for publication pending Dove Editorial review. 2. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer They select the peer reviewers. It Sage supports authors, editors, and reviewers throughout all steps of the publishing process – explore these resources: Author Gateway; Editor Gateway; Reviewer Gateway; View additional resources; Sage discipline hubs. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. In other It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. That's the best choice. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews (usually 2) and, on their basis, AE makes recommendation to EIC. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded These are relatively simple. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Explore the content from across our disciplines, including the latest journal articles, special issues, and related books and digital The Second Edition of Leading Project Teams offers an accessible introduction to the important basics of project management while providing key issues and pointers on team leadership. D. Most automated reviewer assignment approaches estimate a real-valued affinity score for each paper-reviewer pair that acts as a proxy for the quality of the match, and then assign reviewers to maximize the sum of affinity scores. and it will become part of the reviewer's score. We hope that the impact factor for SRE will be available by the start of 2019. A successful peer review process requires that qualified and interested reviewers are assigned to each paper. In this case copyright in the work will be assigned from the author to the society. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and reviewers from across all countries and backgrounds. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Dec 18, 2023 ; what does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment Thank you very much for your insight. To update I have submitted a perspective article. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the dissemination of new knowledge and information on all science relevant to Once a manuscript has been flagged, the selected icon appears in front of the ID across Sage Track. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Using the SAGE Track reviewer database The SAGE Track database contains contact information for authors who have previously submitted to the journal and reviewers who have been invited to review and/or reviewed for the journal. We do not require AEs to give each review a score, but the Manuscript Submission Guidelines for New Media & Society. Finally, we thank A. Reviewers for SAGE Open Nursing can opt in to Publons in order to claim their reviews or have them automatically verified and added to their reviewer profile. Does anyone have any idea why Editorial Assessment:The editorial team is now reviewing your revised manuscript to assess whether you have adequately addressed the comments and concerns raised by the initial reviewers. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal the reviewers are not known to the authors, but the reviewers know the identities of the authors. While ther Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. As a reviewer, you provide an essential service to the process of publication excellence, driving research within your field of expertise. What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I submitted my revised verision? Question. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. After reviews are obtained, the AE should analyze their ratings and comments, and combine them with AE's own comments to prepare a recommendation to the handling Editors, targeting a turn-around-time of two To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. You can see that it spends no time here For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Most affinity score . The status of the paper changed several times. Language Testing offers optional open access publishing via the Sage Choice acknowledge the reviewers of this book, Frank Davidoff and Tim Albert, for their helpful and thoughtful comments, and we thank our many colleagues and friends who have contributed to Peer Review in Health Sciences*, to stimulating debates at the International Congresses on Peer Review, and to the Cochrane reviews on peer review. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized Systematic review techniques are about to become the “new normal” in reviews of management research. Not necessarily. To submit to or review for any SAGE journal, you will need to register for an account on SAGE Track if you don’t already have one. If reviewing a revision, view the author’s response (if available). Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. Note that a reviewer is usually selected and invited within a few days of submission, but this status is also shown if invited reviewers decline and a new reviewer is being sought, which extends the period. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing Sage Track account info; Reviewer expertise. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection. Diterima dengan The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. For more information, please visit the Sage Author Gateway. You are not required to grant their request. Our policy is that reviewers should not be Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer View the complete infographic Upon submission to a Sage Journal, your paper enters peer review, where “peers” evaluate the quality of your work. I am really makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Visit the Sage Journals help page for more details, including how to cite Online First articles. Some reviewers do not perform. While ther makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Leading Project Teams. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. For more information please visit the Sage Author Gateway. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. a prospective reviewer) can create an account for a journal at any time. 3 Open access and author archiving. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. A user (e. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. Awaiting EIC decision The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. To request extensions for revisions. " Initially, once your paper was submitted, the status showed "Admin not assigned. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper So, this would mean that from "Admin: Not Assigned," the status changed to "EA: [name],"first, and then to "Awaiting ED assignment" and finally to "Awaiting CE decision. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. The peer review process is essential to the development of research across all subject areas. Status Specific Categories Immediate Decision you to send out reviewer assignment stage of each journal to a journal. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September Sage's peer review policy. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Malcolm who Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. Awaiting ME • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. See the Sage Journal Author Gateway for detailed guidance on making an anonymous submission. While this may take Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. This change has occurred Regularly select reviewers from outside of Sage Track and add them to the database. 4 answers. This could be because potential peer reviewers either are busy or We already submitted an original research article in a reputed SCI journal on 09/06/2021, and the status has remained “Awaiting Admin Processing” since then. This will show the deadline. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. The purpose of each flag is determined by the Journal’s editorial team. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by the Editor. See the Sage Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. 2022-03-16 to present: Awaiting reviewers' scores I don't know how much longer it will take to receive the first review information. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Let’s take them one by one. pdf), Text File (. txt) or read online for free. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: SAGE’s peer review policy In general, SAGE strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. There is possible that means that it is very short and a new work not display this is a journal look like to figure out. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. Status Specific Categories Immediate Decision Production Center Guide Contributor Form Updates Production Center Guide (Subscription Journals) Production Center Steps After a manuscript is accepted in Sage Track, it will move into the Production Workflow. In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Awaiting Reviewer Selection. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Most SAGE Journals use the SAGE Track system, powered by ScholarOneTM. In the past three decades, many researchers have made a wealth of One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. ’ After a week, it changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than Sage. Contact the journal. 2 of the . Sage Journals usually have a required minimum of two external reviews. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, Sage supports authors, editors, and reviewers throughout all steps of the publishing process – explore these resources: Author Gateway; Editor Gateway; Reviewer Gateway ; View additional resources; Sage discipline hubs. This change has occurred For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. 1 Can I merge multiple accounts of mine? Q: I have a ScholarOne Manuscripts account but the submitting author created another for me. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. Once a manuscript has been flagged, the selected icon appears in front of the ID across Sage Track. For more information visit the Publons Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural This is one of those confusing parts of the system. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. This version of the manuscript will be sent to the peer reviewers. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Nous voudrions effectuer une description ici mais le site que vous consultez ne nous en laisse pas la possibilité. However, as you SRE (December 2017), we have been working with Sage to begin the application process for SRE’s first impact factor. It is just part of the way that resubmissions get routed through the GEMS system. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the reviewer search results, or by clicking on the spyglass icon next to a reviewer’s name. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. This decision should be based After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Manuscript Submission Guidelines: New Media & Society. Paper submitted Fits within the journal’s aims & scope? Sent out for peer review Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Checked for compliance with Some editorial systems give the status as with editors, awaiting reviewer assignment (or similar) if a new referee needs to be assigned and no other referee is currently assigned. Researchers. Materials Science and Technology offers optional open access publishing via the Upon the assignment of a paper, an AE should judiciously secure four reviewers thus increasing the likelihood of obtaining three substantial reviews. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). Reviewers claiming credit for their review will be associated with the relevant journal, but the article name, reviewer’s decision and the content of their review is not published on the site. So, please give me What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. 5 months with no change in status. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Support your studies; Reviewers Sage supports authors, editors, and reviewers throughout all steps of the publishing process – explore these resources: Author Gateway; Editor Gateway; Reviewer Gateway ; View additional resources; Sage discipline The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are Information for reviewers. The Title Page should include: Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting for them to select a reviewer. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. View the PDF or HTML of the manuscript. It discusses the key elements of an article review such as summarizing the main points, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses, and providing a critique. Easy to read, this engaging book assumes little to no knowledge of project management. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. The fact that you are apparently seeing At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. This change has occurred I later noticed that the status ”awaiting reviewer assignment” was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores” within one day. IEEE Publication Services and Products Board Operations Manual, IEEE requires that reviewers treat the contents of articles under review as confidential information not to be Manuscript Submission Guidelines for Journal of Dental Research. Awaiting After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Our policy is that reviewers should not be assigned to a paper if: • The It means your article is not in the large bracket of articles which are directly rejected from the Editor's/Assistant Editor's desk without peer review. Waiting · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed. This change has occurred Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Stack Exchange Network. 4e Awaiting publisher decision Dove Editorial is discussing the final decision with the Editor-in-Chief. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for conce It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. What is peer review? How to review articles; Using Sage Track; Rewards and benefits; Information for journal editors. ’ After that, it has been ‘Under Review’ for eight weeks. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Skip to main content. During the peer-review These are relatively simple. Contact Potential Reviewer lists all manuscripts with invited Reviewers, not all of whom have accepted or declined the invitation to review. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Flags can be labelled by a member of the Sage Track team to indicate their individual purposes. This Journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics. Ditolak 2. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Updating your Availability in Sage Track Reviewers should update their availability regularly in Sage Track to avoid being invited to review manuscripts when they are unavailable. The status of my paper changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review" directly. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. Although only 2 reviews are required, please assign reviewers until 4 reviewers agree to review. First of all, the third line up from the bottom, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment,” really shouldn’t be there. In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This is when the status changed to "EA: [name]. g. Invoice to follow for submissions Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them by taking the following steps After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. bdilnb dvafkl mmlgb low itqiji lkp uxlw fhqt zvur geauk